Dividing Integers 4.6
According to
your textbook, a useful way to divide integer is to think of it as a multiplication problem.
that is, when you consider -15 ÷ 3 =?
rethink it as 3 · ? = -15.
You know that (3)(-5) = -15
so you can conclude that -15 ÷ 3 = -5
Use similar reasoning for other division
problems!
More
generally, when dividing two integers, divide their absolute values and then
use the same rules applied to multiplying integers:
Specifically:
The quotient
of two positive integers is positive
The quotient
of two negative integers is positive
The quotient
of two integers with different signs is negative
The quotient
of 0 and a non-zero integer is 0.
Note: an
expression with 0 in the divisor such as
4 ÷ 0 is undefined. You cannot divide a
number by 0.
Evaluating
an expression such as -18/x
a) when x =
-3
1. First substitute in using parentheses for the
number -18/(-3)
2. Then DO THE MATH remembering that the quotient of two negative
numbers is positive.
3. The solution is +6.
b) when x =
3
1. First
substitute in using parentheses for the number
-18/(3)
2. Then DO
THE MATH remembering that the quotient of two integers with different signs is
always negative.
3. The
solution is -6.
Finding
an Average With Integers
To find the
average, always add the numbers first.
The example
in the book uses the following measurements (in feet) taken from the bottom of
Lake Michigan and find the average lake bottom’s elevation to its surface….
-844, -865, - 900,
-893, -888
so to add do
the following
-844 +
(-865) + (-900) +(-893) + (-888)
Now, I
recommend stacking them to add carefully.
Remembering the rule for adding integers—when adding integers with the
SAME sign, just add them and USE THEIR sign… so we know the total must still be
negative since they are ALL negative… and we get – 4390
Now, there are
5 numbers so we divide by +5
-4390/5
We see that
we have a negative divided by a positive.
We know our quotient will be negative
-4390/5 =
-878
So the average of the lake’s bottom elevation is
-878 feet or you could state it is 878 feet BELOW the lake surface.
No comments:
Post a Comment